Posted on December 15, 2008 by David Vosburg
It is sad to think that it takes a recession for some social sector organizations to think seriously about their costs and decide to (a) go out of business or (b) merge with another organization. There are examples of social sector organizations consolidating back-office functions or merging before the financial crisis started, but they are [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: acumen, b-labs, financial distress, financial incentive, founder's syndrome, google, impact, pulse, recession, salesforce, social sector | Leave a Comment »
Posted on November 10, 2008 by David Vosburg
I know, I know. Putting these two sentences together is going to get me in trouble, and make me look like a huge dork, but read on. Lucky for me my fiance has not RSS’d my blog…
Two weekends ago I got down on one knee in northwestern Connecticut and gave Katy my grandmother’s ring. It [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: engagement, marriage, Nonprofit, social sector, talent, top talent, turnover, utlity, utlity curve | Leave a Comment »
Posted on October 16, 2008 by David Vosburg
No, this does not mean pay more. (necessarily)
Before I explain, let me ask the fundamental question, why do we work in the non-profit sector? Why do people work in the for-profit sector? What it comes down to is the following economic equation:
Monetary Compensation + Benefit package + Intrinsic Benefits – Costs >= Desired Utility
People will [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: economics, social sector, talent, top talent, utility | Leave a Comment »
Posted on August 7, 2008 by David Vosburg
(in response to this post at Philantopic)
I am a current MBA student whose life’s vocation is to be a nonprofit management leader. Let me contribute my perspective:
The real issue here is not whether MBAs are the silver bullet your organization has been looking for (they’re not). Rather, the issue is whether an MBA program develops [...]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: MBA, Nonprofit, philantopic, social sector, why? | Leave a Comment »